Episode economics

The per-case math of personalized surgery, now that the episode is mandatory.

MSKvalue Insights · July 2026 · For surgery-center and MSK service-line leaders

For a decade, patient-specific planning and implants were sold as clinical elegance — and bought rarely, because under fee-for-service the buyer of “fewer revisions” was nobody. The mandate rewires that. When the facility is accountable for the whole episode, the beneficiary of a better-fitting joint is the facility itself.

The three numbers that matter

Fee-for-service asked: “what does this device cost?” The episode asks: “what does this episode cost, and who keeps the difference when it goes well?” Personalization only ever made economic sense in the second question — and the second question is now the law.

Run your own numbers

Take your last 100 episodes: revision + readmission count inside the window, times your average episode overrun, versus 100 × a per-case planning fee. For most centers the arithmetic is not close. If you want the worksheet version with your own inputs, ask for the briefing — it’s the first thing we walk through.

Start the conversation →

Figures marked * are illustrative and program-dependent; not clinical, legal, or financial advice. MSKvalue assembles independent best-of-class products with the American Joint Replacement Registry as the outcomes backbone.